Parents won a court case and overturned the ruling requiring all children six months through 59 months of age to be vaccinated with the flu vaccine in order to attend preschools, day care centers and Head Start Programs regulated by the City of New York.
When the ‘unlawful proposed mandate’ was passed in New York City in 2014, requiring all young children entering day care, nursery school, pre-school, and kindergarten to be fully vaccinated with the flu vaccination, the news hit nearly every newspaper, radio show and television outlet in the US.
Not a day went by that news of this so-called medical victory was not discussed by a news reporter somewhere. Parents throughout New York City had just had all their vaccination rights snatched away from them and instead of outrage, as one would expect, there was jubilation.
One group of parents however, was less than happy about the news, because they felt that their rights had been violated. Instead of sitting back, doing nothing and accepting the inevitable, they decided to oppose the decision in the courts in regard to the yearly flu vaccine.
In an unprecedented step, they decided that enough was enough and that they would bring a lawsuit against the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; the New York City Board of Health; and Dr. Mary Travis Bassett in her official capacity as Commissioner of the New York City Department of Mental Health and Hygiene. This was because they had pushed through a requirement that all parents wishing their children to attend pre-schools, day care centers and Head Start Programs regulated by the City of New York had to have their children fully vaccinated, including the yearly flu vaccine which was not originally included on the mandate.
However, as of December 16, 2015, the flu vaccine is NO LONGER a requirement because, amazingly, at the end of a triumphant and victorious battle, the parents WON their case.
Speaking from the steps of Manhattan Supreme Court, Michelle Carol, one of the brave parents involved in the case, made the following statement to the US press:
“I just think that it is important to remember that vaccines are drugs, and just like any drug, not every vaccine is going to be right for every single child. This ruling is important because it leaves the decision about whether or not to vaccinate our smallest, youngest and most vulnerable citizens to the pediatricians and parents, which is important.”
With news on this scale, why has mainstream media not taken this story and run with it? After all, it is not every day that a battle of this magnitude is won. Why has this news not reached the parents of NYC? Sallie Elkordy, a frontrunner in this battle against mandatory vaccination, told The Liberty Beacon that many of the parents whom she has spoken to since the hearing have not been made aware that this vaccine is no longer a legal requirement. She feels that parents should be made aware of this fact as soon as possible; so that they can make an informed choice as to whether or not they should have their child vaccinated.
In his final ruling, Judge Manual J. Mendez wrote:
Notice his words, NOT LAWFUL! It was because the flu vaccine was added unlawfully, that this ruling could be overturned, making this an outright victory for the parents who support informed choice. The full ruling can be found here.
Aaron Siri, a lawyer who worked with the parents who filed the suit against the city, told The New York Times that the health department had greatly overstepped its authority:
“Parents across the city who, in consultation with their doctors, made the decision that the risks outweighed the benefits for their particular child, had that right taken away from them by 11 unelected individuals sitting in the Board of Health right across the street.”
At a news conference in Lower Manhattan, Mr. Siri said that:
“If anybody is going to take away that right, it should be the elected representatives of this state.”
Sallie Elkordy, who has been fighting this decision with parents from the onset, called the judge’s ruling a “Christmas Blessing.”Making her thoughts and feelings on the court’s decision very clear, she has spoken out across America on public access television.
In public broadcasts, Ms. Elkordy thanked not only Judge Mendez for his decision on the ruling, but also the five brave parents whom she believed put their own children on the line to save other children. Not forgetting to thank attorney Aaron Siri, who was brave enough to take this case on pro-bono, she gave everyone a fitting tribute. To see her tributes and to learn more about the ruling, see the public access show below.
The Liberty Beacon contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
When feeding the homeless becomes an act of civil disobedience, Americans have been asleep for far too long.
Luckily, however, there are still good people who are willing to defy such arbitrary and ill-conceived laws and ordinances.
The folks over at the aptly named organization Don’t Comply, took to the streets just outside the Austin Street Shelter in Dallas this weekend to perform, what has now become a revolutionary act – feeding the homeless.
“We are not complying with a bad law today,” Matthew Short, PR director of Don’t Comply said. “Evidently the city of Dallas believes that it’s wrong, or bad, or unlawful for us to feed more than a certain number of people at a time. But, during Christmas, we want to show love to our community and give these people a chance to survive the winter, whether it be with blankets or coats, or just giving them a holiday party like today with all kinds of cookies, and goodies, turkey and dressing, and the whole nine yards.”
Last December, the Dallas city council enacted Ordinance No. 29595, which makes it illegal to serve food to the homeless without jumping through a statist myriad of bureaucratic hoops, including a fee, training classes, and written notices.
One should not need to file multiple forms and pay a fee to obtain a permit to give food to those in need who are willingly ready to accept it. The folks at Don’t Comply know this.
According to Brett Sanders, hundreds of homeless people showed up to not only enjoy a fantastic array of food, snacks and beverages – but there was also an assortment of winter clothing that was donated as well.
“All of the homeless people that I talked to during the event were extremely grateful for the support and there was a sense of humanity that is indescribable. Interacting with other human beings whom most consider to be living life at rock bottom will likely alter your perspective on the world around you,” explained Sanders.
The event went off without a hitch, even after code enforcers showed up. Lead organizer of the event, Murdoch Pizgatti was confronted by the enforcers who told him to file the proper paperwork upon the event’s conclusion to which, Pizgatti politely replied, “no.”
“We’ve already had to speak to the police, they’ve already come and delivered code to us,” said Short, explaining what happened when the code enforcers showed up. “But, after shaking hands with them, they realized we’re all armed – and we’re gonna do what we’re gonna do because it’s not an immoral thing that we are doing.”
Below is the powerful video shot by Brett Sanders showing the powerful effects of such moral civil disobedience.
I am truly sorry for the deaths resulting from the Paris attack. That is if there were real deaths. I do not at all mean to demean any of the people who may have died. We are all equally important. However, there are several suspicious incidents that fit the earmarks of a false flag event. I also have not seen any news reports showing deaths. I've seen an CNN report showing a man covered under a yellow tarp at an airport while reporting a terrorist blew himself up. However, I did not see any blood or the actual blowing up. Don't airports have cameras covering every angle? I also saw a news clip of a cop being shot, but the resolution was bad, the cop was too small and he was blurred out (this was for the Hebdo attack). Most of the news clips are of people reporting their experience of it, but not of actual evidence. I don't have the urls for these news reports, and if anyone can find any that does show actual evidence of real death, please leave a comment of a news clip where you saw actual evidence. There might have been real deaths, but there were also crisis actors who were also seen in the recent past during other crisis's.
Of course, false flags are not always fake disasters, sometimes the disasters are real, but are used to fulfill an agenda. Constant media coverage is usually a sign of this. Why was there NOT much coverage of the Libya, Syria, and Beirut attacks, and others?
The news has reported instantly that ISIS was behind it and the fear of Muslims is created again (as with the 911 attacks). It has been known for a while that ISIS is the United States (and now it comes out via Putin that ISIS is funded by 40 countries). Syria, who has already been suffering horrific attacks, has also been blamed based on a passport found in Germany. Now France, thanks to propaganda, is supporting bombing Syria. It is apparent these people are not aware that when you bomb a country; you are killing children, families, babies and pets. What a sad disconnection from reality. It is imperative that the masses learn that an attack on Syria and six other countries was already planned as early as 2001 according to whistle blower, General Wesley Clark (Wars Were Planned - Seven Countries In Five Years). One can say this is hearsay, but most of the seven countries Wesley Clark mentioned have been attacked since after he blew the whistle.
There have been recent events and an upcoming event that would make France an ideal place to have a false flag (whether a real attack occured or not) to create fear throughout Europe, Canada and America to justify the taking of more rights and freedoms and attacks on more peoples. Here are at least four things (that I know of at the top of my head) that would add to the idealness of choosing France as the location of a large terrorist attack: Netanyahu warns of 'grave mistake' if France recognizes Palestine, France recently rejected the TTIP, French Court Finds Monsanto Guilty of Chemical Poisoning and the upcoming COP21 Climate Conference in Paris.The COP21 Climate Conference is a meeting of over 120 world leaders and is used for creating a one world government via Agenda 21 based on CO2 being a pollutant. Chemtrail activists were planning to attend the COP21 to try to get the truth heard about geoengineering and the global warming co2 scam. Now, France is convienently bordered off.
A new world order has been incrementally created and the COP21 and the Paris attack seem to be major large steps towards it. See for yourself what Henry Kissinger had said in 2014 regarding the New World Order: Globalist Henry Kissinger Outlines “New World Order”.
There have been so many strange "coincidences" which I'll list below, but here is one that warrants further explanation. That is the perpetrators being identified by fallen passports. This happened with 911, the Charlie Hebdo shootings and now the Paris attacks. A passport on the ground after hundreds or thousands of deaths is not evidence. If there actually were passports found in mint condition at these scenes, the governments would have no way of knowing whethert they belonged to a perpetrator or to a victim. Here I think I must mention that governments are now only vehicles to be used by globalists most of whom are part of the Illuminati.
In January 2012, HR4310 was written to amend the 1948 Act which made propaganda illegal and changed it to make propaganda legal through movies and other media (see pages 326-328). Since then, false flag events (excluding 911) have come so head-spinningly fast.
Uncanny Coincidences and Earmarks of a False Flag
1. Drill for same event happening just before or during the event
911, Sandy Hook, Boston Bombing, Paris multi-site attack
2. Perpetrator identified by a fallen passport
911, Charlie Hebdo, Paris multi-site attack
3. Repeat crisis actor or fake victim caught
Sandy Hook, Boston Bombing, Aurora, Paris attack, Foley beheading
4. Rights of citizens taken away
911, Paris attack
5. Media relentlessly trying to persuade the public it is better to give up rights for safety
911, Sandy Hook, Aurora, Virginia shooting, Oregon shooting, Paris attack
6. Continuous media coverage
All the above mentioned
7. The perpetrators die
911, Paris attack, a few of the shootings
8. A group is accused when the government was behind it
911, Paris attack
Accompanying videos and links:
JOURNALIST SPEAKS THE TRUTH ABOUT PARIS ATTACK
ABSOLUTE PROOF PARIS ATTACK WAS A STAGED EVENT
ISIS financed from 40 countries, incl G20 members – Putin (FULL SPEECH)
Paris Attacks: Multi-site Exercise planned for morning of Nov 13,2015
Bottom line: it has been made clear that the majority of the attacks have been maneuvers to manipulate the public into agreeing to losing rights and to attacking other countries (not soldiers or governments, but towns and cities). It is time to grow up and share the truth in order to disempower the globalists (who work through government) from manipulating the public. It is especially important that the enforcers of the crimes and corruption are made aware of who and what they are really supporting. The enforcers being the police and the military.