by Dane Wigington
All the elements of our corporate fascist industrialized criminal global world order are uniting to further tighten their control over the Earth’s life support systems and thus global populations. Those who control the climate engineering must also control the flow of information. They must have paid actors like those at the Weather Channel to convince the public that the ever more unnatural and engineered weather is in fact completely natural and normal.
The marriage of The Weather Channel and Monsanto further broadens the web of information control that is completely connected to the ecocidal and genocidal geoengineering insanity that is decimating our biosphere. All those involved with these criminal corporations and criminal activities must be exposed, this will take all of us to accomplish. Make your voice heard in this fight against total tyranny. The article below shines yet more light on the Weather Channel/Monsanto criminal alliance.
Weather Channel Joins Hands With Monsanto GeoEngineering
The Weather Channel, has become an overt Public Relations Firm for GeoEngineering – Weather Modification. The Weather Channel is now in bed with Monsanto:
The Weather Channel Interactive and Monsanto Announce New Agriculture News & Forecast Web Site
But why all the secrecy while at the same time injecting mind conditioning images into television commercials in order to get the public mind to subliminally acquiesce to its arrogant science of GeoEngineering?
I was watching a few minutes of idiocy on television the other evening, when my eyes happened to catch a three-second subliminal injection of a GeoEngineering aerosol spray trail in the background of a car commercial. I was absolutely stunned with disbelief! I rolled the program back, froze the image and snapped it with a camera. This is blatant psychological manipulation to condition the public mind into submission that it is perfectly fine for an arrogant military science to “Own the Weather.”
What sort of pathology drives reckless individuals to strive for such heights? Where is the FCC and why, as a ‘Public Servant’ isn’t it informing the population of the deadly toxins being dumped on them. Why the stealthy knife in the back approach such as this?
As an agent of Chemical Giant, Monsanto, would not this make the Weather Channel complicit in crimes against humanity and the planet, especially since this global spraying campaign is dumping billions of tonnes of toxins into our lungs and environment?
Even NASA is involved in the mind conditioning process. The following cloud chart from NASA is being used in public schools to teach your children that artificial chemical clouds (chemtrails) are safe and natural:
VIDEO New NASA Disinformation: Cloud Chart for Schoolchildren
MORE AT GEOENGINEERINGWATCH>>
RELATED at the BOLE
Their Sky Has Changed!' Inuit elders sharing information
It’s been called contraceptive corn and spermicidal corn. A San Diego company called Epicyte developed it.
Here’s a brief backgrounder from The Guardian, Sept. 9, 2001; “GM corn set to stop man spreading his seed,” by Robin McKie:
“Scientists have created the ultimate GM crop: contraceptive corn. Waiving fields of maize may one day save the world from overpopulation.
“The pregnancy prevention plants are the handiwork of the San Diego biotechnology company Epicyte, where researchers have discovered a rare class of human antibodies that attack sperm.
“By isolating the genes that regulate the manufacture of these antibodies, and by putting them in corn plants, the company has created tiny horticultural factories that make contraceptives.
“'We have a hothouse filled with corn plants that make anti-sperm antibodies,' said Epicyte president Mitch Hein.
“…The company, which says it will not grow the maize near other crops, says it plans to launch clinical trials of the corn in a few months.”
I love that last line. Gene drift from plant to plant, field to field, food product to food product? Apparently, Epicyte never heard of it. Every food scientist in the world knows about it, but not Epicyte.
So what happened to the company?
In 2004, it was bought out by Biolex, a North Carolina biotech firm. Then, in 2012, Biolex filed for bankruptcy. Before it did, it sold some of its technology to Synthon, a Dutch drug company that makes Paxil, known for causing birth defects.
The depopulation corn technology? It could be floating around in a number of places by now.
In April of this year, Russia announced it would ban imports of GMO food products. By the end of July, China had stopped importing corn from the US.
Of course, no mention was made of Depopulation Corn. Russia and China are fully aware of, what shall we call them, the conventional dangers of GMO food.
However, China and Russia might check on the “other thing” while they’re at it—the spermicidal genes—to see whether they’ve been importing that type of corn.
You might think China would welcome Depop Corn. I beg to differ. If they’re going to do Depop, they want to engineer it themselves. And then there is the fact that corn is omnipresent in hundreds of thousands, even millions of processed food products. Chinese leaders themselves would thus become subject to Depop without even knowing it.
And what about the USA? Why haven’t I mentioned it?
Because in America, the high-minded campaign is all about labeling GMOs, not banning them. It’s embarrassing.
And with gene drift, in which all sorts of biotech genes float on the wind across the land, and settle into plants of every kind, to say nothing of factories, where processed food is manufactured, what are the chances that labels are going to save the day?
Several counties in the US have enacted bans on growing GMO crops, and as I’ve been detailing, the voters of Maui recently struck a major blow and decided to stop Monsanto and Dow from launching new GMO experiments.
But Monsanto and Dow immediately sued, and the county government of Maui is on their side—and against their own voters.
Press coverage of this ongoing battle is weak, soft and small.
The majority of anti-GMO activists in the US have been brought into the labeling movement, because they think and hope that Shopping Moms will stage a revolution and bring Monsanto and Dow to their knees.
The Moms, that is, who aren’t too busy with their husbands trying to get pregnant through exotic high-tech strategies, because, for some odd reason, the normal time-tested methods aren’t working.
Jon Rappoport is the author of two explosive collections, The Matrix Revealed and Exit From the Matrix, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com
Barbara H. Peterson
Barbara H. Peterson
If you had any doubt about the boldfaced sham that “democracy” is, that doubt should be completely alleviated now. The people in Hawaii County voted that they did not want GMOs.
…in addition to banning any new GMO crops. The bill forbids any open-air testing or production of genetically modified crops. It also prohibits farmers from growing any new GMO crops but grandfathers in those that are already being grown, such as the Rainbow papaya.
The court overruled that vote in favor of the biggest pro-GMO agricultural corporation of all – state and federal biotech interests.
The complaint from the Big Island farmers and Biotechnology Industry Organization contended thatBill 113, which Hawaii County passed last year, was not backed by scientific evidence. The suit said that genetically modified farming has become a “critical and generally accepted part of agriculture” over the last 20 years, and the ordinance violates both state and federal law.
In Wednesday’s decision, Kurren argued that although the state does not specifically regulate genetically modified crops, Ordinance 13-121 still conflicts with the work of state agencies.
He said the state Department of Agriculture and state Board of Agriculture comprise a “comprehensive statewide framework” governing plants that may “injure or harm agriculture, the environment or public health.”
“Clearly, the state legislature intended this network of the HDOA, the HBOA, and the advisory committee to have extensive and broad responsibilities over agricultural problems spanning the various counties to form a coherent and comprehensive statewide agricultural policy,” he wrote.
“In light of the comprehensive statutes and the network designed to address statewide agriculture problems, the Court concludes that the legislative intent for an exclusive, uniform and comprehensive state statutory scheme on the precise subject matter addressed by Ordinance 13-121 preempts the County’s ban on genetically engineered organisms.”
Not backed by scientific evidence? I guess they didn’t get the Open Letter from World Scientists to All Governments Concerning Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs),signed by 815 scientists from 82 different countries.
Ban GMOs Now
This is a dangerous situation for the future of food and farming, one that needs to be reversed as quickly as possible, particularly as GM agriculture is failing on all counts. That can only be achieved by a ban on GMOs, an action already taken by countries and local communities around the world. We need to join forces with them, to put an end to the GM corporate empire.
Ten years ago, 24 scientists from around the world formed an Independent Science Panel and produced a report ( The Case for A GM-Free Sustainable World, ISIS/TWN publication) summarizing compelling evidence on the hazards of GM crops and the benefits of organic agro-ecological farming, and called for a global ban on environmental releases of GMOs, and a shift to non-GM sustainable agriculture. This report was widely circulated, translated into several languages, and republished in the US a year later. It remains the most succinct and complete account on the subject; but crucial new evidence has come to light within the past decade that strengthens the case considerably.
First of all, decisive evidence has emerged on the unsustainability and destructiveness of conventional industrial agriculture, of which GM is the most extreme; in stark contrast to the proven successes of non-GM ecological farming: its productivity and resilience, environmental and health benefits, and in particular, its enormous potential for saving energy and carbon emissions in mitigating and adapting to climate change. We presented all that in a comprehensive and definitive report published in 2008 ( Food Futures Now *Organic *Sustainable *Fossil Fuel Free , ISIS/TWN publication). Our report is completely in line with the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD) report , which resulted from a three-year consultative process involving 900 participants and 110 countries around the world; a sure sign of the scientific consensus that has emerged around non-GM ecological farming as the way forward in food and farming.
To complete the case, we need to bring together all the damning evidence against GMOs on health and the environment, especially in the light of new discoveries in molecular genetics within the past ten years. That is the main reason for the present report. GM agriculture is a recipe for disaster, as this report will make clear. It is also standing in the way of the shift to sustainable agriculture already taking place in local communities all over the world that can truly enable people to feed themselves in times of climate change. Future generations will not forgive us if we do not stop the GM takeover now.
Please use this report, circulate it widely, and send it to your political representatives.
That, apparently, doesn’t count. Neither do the plethora of studies now coming out by reputable scientists such as Dr. Stephanie Seneff, MIT Senior Research Scientist, Dr. Nancy Swanson, Retired United States Navy staff scientist, Anthony Samsel, Retired Science Consultant, and Dr. Don M. Huber, Professor Emeritus, Purdue University, all of whom emphatically state:
A huge increase in the incidence and prevalence of chronic diseases has been reported in the United States (US) over the last 20 years. Similar increases have been seen globally.
The herbicide glyphosate was introduced in 1974 and its use is accelerating with the advent of herbicide-tolerant genetically engineered (GE) crops. Evidence is mounting that glyphosate interferes with many metabolic processes in plants and animals and glyphosate residues have been detected in both.
Glyphosate disrupts the endocrine system and the balance of gut bacteria, it damages DNA and is a driver of mutations that lead to cancer. In the present study, US government databases were searched for GE crop data, glyphosate application data and disease epidemiological data.
The significance and strength of the correlations show that the effects of glyphosate and GE crops on human health should be further investigated.
Unfortunately, any position other than that which states “we the corporations have the right to poison you the people for profit” will not be allowed. If you vote to keep us from doing so, we will throw your vote in the trash and just keep on poisoning you.
©2014 Barbara H. Peterson