Because I am accused I'd make propaganda for Russia, there are bad news out of the evil Russia.
The Russian government rejects any form of genetically modified organisms (GMO®s) the Russian Deputy Prime Minister Arkady Dvorkovich said on the occasion of the International Economic Forum, which took place in St. Petersburg between the 18th and 20th of June.
He told the participants, Russia has
'chosen another way' and so '[…] does not use technologies' to increase agricultural production.
Because Russia has enough land area for a natural cultivation, what makes the food in the country to the 'cleanest in the world'
makes Dvorkovich clear.
Russia is in fact firmly convinced GMO®s cause adverse health effects such as deformities in babies and cancer.
Parsifal, July 15, 2015
This announcement is in line with the demand of President Putin, who has already said in 2014 that Russian citizens must be protected from GMOs.
Russia has become a leader in the clean up of its agricultural area of all the toxins from the past, either pesticides or other harmful substances.
The Vice President of the Russian National Association for Genetic Security, Irina Ermakova, following on the subject said:
'It has not only proved in Russia but in many other countries around the world, GMOs are dangerous.
Consumption of GMOs can lead to tumors, cancer and obesity in animals'.
If the Americans necessarily want GMO®s, then let them do it, of course, only the Russians prefer natural grown food.
The Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev announced last year, Russia would no longer import any GMO® products.
He said as an explanation, Russia has more than enough agricultural land and resources to operate organic farming, safe and clean, without the need for patented seeds that will be bred by agriculture corporations® bred with genetic manipulation® and only with their own appropriate broad-spectrum herbicides is growing ever.
'If the Americans like to eat GMO® products, then let them eat it. We don't have to do that, because we have enough space and opportunity to produce organic healthy foods'
Yes, these evil Russian politicians who are worried about the health of the population.
That is outrageous and unacceptable.
Russians kindly, have to be like their Western counterparts, which hardly oppose the gene-filth and Franken Food which only represented the interests of the agricultural multinationals like Monsanto®, Syngenta®, Pioneer® and Bayer Crop Science®.
Finally, corporate welfare and the maximization of profits® have priority anyway.
These are also the major campaign contributors, which should not be scared.
So in Russia, I do not want to live, because I think its outrageous how all the peoples there are taken the liberty to consume genetically modified crops.
Since we are still in the 'free West' much better off.
We can choose between organic and GMO®, which is pure FREEDOM® !
... Sorry, no, we can not, because the politicians have rejected a clear labeling of GMO® products as such.
I now hear quite loudly 'PURCHASED POLITICIANS®' and 'CORRUPTION®' ?
Oh no trace.
On January 6, 2005, a fine of 1.5 million dollars was imposed upon Monsanto® since the corporation bribed from 1997 to 2002 at least 140 government officials in Indonesia in order for the introduction of Bt cotton variety 'Bollgard 'on the part of the Indonesian government to subvert required environmental risk assessment.
Thereby flowed bribes amounting to 700.000 US dollars with which, among others books and invoices were falsified.
Scientists are not bought !
As the Federal Agency for Agriculture had the sale of genetically modified maize MON810® banned in Deutschland® 2009®, protested against this decision 'renowned' German® scientific organizations (e.g. Helmholtz Community®, Fraunhofer Community®, Max Planck Community®, German Scientific Organization®, Leibniz Community®) in a joint statement.
Goodness, the US gov® exerts no pressure !
Shortly after the decision not to allow the cultivation of MON810® on German agricultural land, the Trade Commissioner of the United States® Ron Kirk summoned the German Ambassador Klaus Scharioth in Washington® to the Ministry, where he expressed the displeasure of the US gov® on prohibitions of MON810®.
In addition, as shown by the publishing of WikiLeaks US embassy cables, US Diplomats® have worked for Monsanto® and officially championed on Monsanto's request for a less restrictive genetic engineering policy … worldwide.
The Squirrel Test:
Your support to have the B.O.L.E. (incl. all articles) open and free for everyone is much appreciated.
The shorter piston is genetically modified corn and the longer normal corn.
Left picture is before the test and the right picture shows which piston has been eaten empty.
They have briefly tried and the GM maize then spurned.
The squirrels know what is good for them and what not !
images top http://www.deesillustration.com/index.asp
According to a new strategic report of the PentaGram, the US military has classified Russia and China as a threat to national security interests.
The Chief of Staff of all US forces, Martin Dempsey, has even talked on Wednesday of a 'small but growing' probability that the US must wage war with these major powers.
The main reason for the alleged threat is claimed in the 24-page strategy report the annexation of the Crimea by Russia and China's territorial disputes with neighboring countries over islands in the South and East China Sea.
The Iran and North Korea are also seen as threats in the report due to their nuclear programs.
Dempsey is concerned about the creeping loss of power of the US Army.
'Our comparatively military advantage has begun to erode',
is stated in the strategy paper.
'Today's security environment is the most unpredictable which I have experienced in 40 years of service'.
In conclusion Dempsey calls for more money for the US military, so that the US may continue its 'global responsibility' needs.
Parsifal, July 2, 2015
Aha, that's the point, then, more money for the war machine that anyway has a 'defense budget', almost as high as all other countries combined.
Translated, the statement of Dempsey, the United Satans of America are afraid to lose their global supremacy, therefore, inventing with lies a threat from Russia and China, as well as The Iran and North Korea to squeeze out more tax money for themselves.
Officially, the budget for the PentaGram amounted only to ridiculous 600 billion dollars.
In fact, it is closer to USD 1.2 trillion if you add the cost of the wars that are not included, plus the military spending of 16 US intelligence agencies, the US State Department and the Congress for the 'democratization' of countries, including the billions on propaganda.
For example, Victoria Fuck The EU Nuland confirmed, 5 billion dollars were spent alone only for 'regime change' in Ukraine.
These funds for subversions you have to add, because the US is waging one war at all levels, tucked away on the institutions 'democratization', through NGOs, foundations and 'independent' think tanks, plus a cyber - and information war.
The budget for this will be spread over many ministries, so it does not look so high, but all are used for the maintenance and expansion of the Empire of the USSA.
If you study the budget of the US State Department in 2015, one sees an item of fabulous USD 50.3 billion just for itselves and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).
That alone is much more than Germany issues for 'defense' (42 billion euros).
Russia has a budget of 52.5 and China of 87 billion euros for the military.
USAID is also just a front organization for the expansive hegemony.
The NSA, CIA, and how the many other Secret Services are called, add to with more than 50 billion dollars of official budget.
The unofficial monies 'generated' by drug trafficking, other criminal black business and machinations, one must also add like worldwide infiltration, hidden wars and the whole gamut of colorful revolutions, Arab 'Springs' of the government coups programs.
See Iran-Contra Affair, to name just one example.
Additionally to the gigantic American military budget you have to number along those of other NATO countries, plus the ANZUS states (Pacific NATO), as well as from Japan and South Korea, because these lackeys under the spell of the US Empire serve the preservation and expansion.
The so-called 'coalition of the willing' ('cling-on' or simply expressed slave states) indeed participate at all US-led 'security operations' far away from their own territories the commanded aggressive wars.
ASEAN should also be given a military arm, which will be under US dominance.
So in this western military superiority it's completely ridiculous when are honest considered Russia and China a threat to the US territory in North America.
Russia and China, or The Iran and North Korea, neither built military bases right on the US border, or have deployed missiles there, nor go with warships off the US coast back and forth.
But that does the United States, provoking constantly with their military equipment under the noses of others.
The ultimate symbol of the Cold War is again applied to the confrontation between NATO and Russia.
14 days ago, the PentaGram sent B-52 Stratofortress bombers which are equipped with nuclear weapons, to Sweden, allegedly as part of the NATO-maneuver 'Baltops'.
The no longer 'neutral' Sweden has long been integrated and even in the encirclement and threat to Russia.
Therefore, the horror stories of non-existent Russian submarines (see annex) were invented, which were supposed to be turned up in Swedish waters.
There is zero evidence, so it's all about to scare the Europeans.
Washington did not really fear the Russians and the Chinese will invade or attack the US, Europe or Asia, but wants to enforce its aggressive policy for total control by military means.
In fact, the two 'rivals' were completely surrounded by US military bases and Washington puts the arrogant territorial claim, the Baltic Sea, the Black Sea, the China Sea, the Atlantic and the Pacific, yes indeed all oceans to appertain the United States.
Russia and China do not longer accept an unipolar world, so no sole US dominance over the planet, want to preserve their own interests' and that's what bothers Washington.
Therefore, the PentaGram claimed quite cheeky, Russia 'does not respect the sovereignty of its neighbors and is ready to use force to achieve its objectives'.
China's actions 'raise tensions in the Asia-Pacific region'.
Iran 'strives for nuclear and missile technologies' and is a 'state sponsor of terrorism'.
North Korea threatens its neighbors by 'the pursuit of nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles'.
This invention of threats and hold itself up as a blueprint of innocence, this hypocrisy and prevarication is incredible.
None of the accused countries here are involved in a war against anyone, but while the US leads several wars, such as in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria, is flying over numerous countries killer drones and has military forces stationed in more than 100 occupied countries.
The conflict in the Ukraine in the form of a civil war (meanwhile increasingly proxy war) alone has to answer Washington.
We meanwhile know that the crisis in Ukraine and thus Western conquest of the immediate neighbors of Russia has been around for over 20 years, planned by Washington.
The aim was to grab Crimea thus to have a naval base in the Black Sea and bounce the Russians from Sevastopol.
I have pointed out this fact on the basis of documents, such as the US Navy had over the years already invested millions of dollars in buildings in Sevastopol.
The US Navy wanted to move in after the coup.
see 'As the U.S. Navy helps Crimea'.
When the violent coup in Kiev took place which was directed by the US, the democratically elected President Viktor Yanukovych was deposed and Nazis came to power, realized the population of Crimea, of this criminal junta it does not want to be governed.
Washington took advantage of the Olympic Games in Sochi as a cover and distraction, because they knew the host of the sports world would be Putin and Russia ever so fully busy.
So they accomplished the 'regime change' to get Ukraine into their own sphere of influence.
It was then the task of the West media complicity, with (yawn) lies and propaganda, to sell this coup the world audience as 'democratic change'.
Immediately after the Olympics, President Putin introduced countermeasures.
He realized an acquisition of strategic Crimea ultimately by NATO, the expulsion of the Russian Navy in Sevastopol, the ravages of ultra-nationalists against the people must not take place.
So the referendum was held in the Crimea, with the simple question will you continue to belong to the Ukraine or to join the Russian Federation ?
About 90 percent of the electorate voted for reunification and so signaled the world that they would prefer to be again a part of the Russian Federation rather than ruled by Nazis.
Historically, the Crimea was for many centuries Russian;
the majority of the population of Crimea is of Russian descent,
and the 'gift' of Crimea by Nikita Khrushchev in 1954 to his homeland, the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, was anyway illegal.
No one was asked, let alone the population.
To say that the Crimea belongs to Ukraine, is just as absurd as the claim that Austria is part of Germany simply because Adolf has his 'homeland' once incorporated into the Reich by 'affiliation'.
Washington and its European lapdogs have then invented the lie about annexation of the Crimea by Russia and insist to this day on this claim, ignoring the historical connection and the democratic will of the sovereign through a referendum.
Important is but not what the coup regime in Kiev thinks or what Washington, Brussels or Berlin argue because of maintaining the 'territorial integrity', but only and alone what is the will of the population of Crimea.
Every nation has the right to decide whether it wants to be independent, or part from a state and wants to join another even if this law of nations, the oh so democratic West permanently and vehemently rejects and knows to prevent his for independence striving States.
That of all people, The Merkel does not recognize international law, is an outrage.
She's only Chancellor, because there has been the unification of the GDR and the FRG.
In this case, no referendum was held in contrast to the Crimea.
The citizens of the GDR were never asked if they want to give up their own state and be incorporated to the FRG.
This was swept over their heads as dictated by the West.
Therefore, whoever wants the Russians give lessons about 'democracy' or 'international law' ?
Not to mention the illegal, forced by the West secession of Kosovo from Serbia.
There, too, there has never been a referendum.
I provide here another example of how the West and especially the United States are applying double standards and themselves do what they want, when they say do what we command and not what we, ourselves are doing.
We are witnessing the state bankruptcy of Greece.
At the same time but has a different 'territory' declared bankruptcy, namely Puerto Rico.
The island, which is not a full-fledged US state, has a public debt of 72 billion US dollars.
End of June 2015 declared Governor Padilla that Puerto Rico could serve no more due loans, the island is therefore bankrupt.
How has Washington ever became 'owner' of Puerto Rico ?
Yes, well, how ?
Through a war of conquest, of course.
1898 occupied the United States Puerto Rico during the Spanish-American War and claimed the island for itself.
This was more than an annexation, but a violent foray.
The same applies to the other so-called US foreign territories such as the many islands in the Pacific, all conquered, or were stolen, including Hawaii.
What a monstrosity by Washington therefore of the referendum, which took place on the other side of the world in the Crimea, to construct an aggression on the part of Russia and thus to justify sanctions, and to consider Russia as a threat, which is why they will start a new arms race which might lead to international war on European soil.
For every person reasonable minded but is again the proof, in Washington sitting dangerous psychopaths who want by lies and prevarication justify their ambitions for world conquest.
In the strategy paper is namely established, the PentaGram is willing to wage a nuclear war.
'In the event of an attack, the US military will react with a damage of highest magnitude to force the enemy to a cease-fire or to make incapable of further aggression. A war against a larger opponent will make the full mobilization of all instruments of national power necessary'.
Mentioned is also the reintroduction of mandatory military service, how it's said to have enough manpower for a larger opponent.
The warmongers see apparently in everything and everyone an enemy.
According the latest revelations of WikiLeaks, Washington has tapped and bugged the telephones of almost all ministries in Berlin, also talks of Merkel (see here translated by google translate http://tinyurl.com/pc9uttr).
What the content-free speech bubbles and multi-clause sentence oozing *), external shame inducing remote controlled walking pantsuit, political actor The Merkel® (only genuine with the rhomb) has said in 2013 after the NSA scandal became known to the public ?
'Spying among friends - this is a no-go'.
Only, this traitor has done nothing against the espionage !
Idle is to ask the question why the German population still accepted a government that is working for and by foreign powers.
Germans get what they deserve !
Washington and its puppet masters have never seen in Europe a friend, but considered useful idiots, to be incited repeatedly against Russia in the war.
When especially the population in the West will wake up and finally realize who the real enemy of mankind is and only wants death and destruction ?
We in Europe must not be protected before Russia or China, and certainly not against The Iran or North Korea, but only from our 'friend and partner' the USSA !
'Fuck off USA' ...
'Yankees go home'
*) Incidentally, 'Bla Bla Bla' is in English 'Yadda-Yadda'
Here is the link to the strategy report (.pdf) ...
Do not miss my next digital diary in this theatre to find out about Russia's reaction to the newest US - war - threat
The Americans know exactly when Russia and China join forces to an economic block with the other BRIC countries, they sink to insignificance.
In reality it's not about the military threat from Russia and China, but about the economic issue.
The Yanks are now trying to prevent this collaboration by all available means.
They manage again and again to drive a wedge where it benefits their interests:
Between Germany and Russia.
Between Ukraine and Russia.
Between Sunnis and Shiites.
And between Christians and Muslims, as was recently with the attacks in France and Denmark.
They repeatedly make it to turn sister peoples or befriended cultures against each other.
Your support to have the B.O.L.E. (incl. all articles) open and free for everyone is much appreciated.
Sweden hunts for mystery submarine October 21, 2014
Sweden hunting for suspected Russian sub
The radio transmissions were being sent to the Russian enclave of Kaliningrad, 330 miles (530 kilometers) south of Stockholm on the Baltic's southern shore, according to The Local report.
There were also reports that a foreign vessel was spotted in the waters near Stockholm.
Russia ... denied it has any vessel in Swedish waters.
Moscow suggested the vessel may belong to the Netherlands and have been involved in naval exercises off Sweden, according to a report from Russia's Itar-TASS news agency.
(read more if you trust the Censored News Network, Crap Not News) http://edition.cnn.com/2014/10/20/world/europe/sweden-russia-submarine-mystery/index.html
and so the submarine issue really was
Saab unveils superstealth 'ghost submarine' that is virtually invisible to enemies and even allows divers to silently enter and exit
Saab has unveiled what it claims is the world's most advanced stealth submarine.
Sweden is unleashing its GHOST (Genuine HOlistic STealth) technology, thus making the Kockums A26 submarine effectively invisible.
(read more in the dailymail)
Several times I pointed with my articles to the fact, which double standards of the West apply when it comes to the assessment of governments.
Washington separates the leadership of countries in good and bad, depending on whether they serve their interests or not.
As said Henry Kissinger ?
'The US has no friends, the US has interests'
In which category the classification takes place depends on whether a country obeys the orders of Washington or not.
This division into good and bad often changes.
That had Saddam Hussein (Iraq) known, just like Muhamar Ghaddafi (Libya), or Zine Ben Ali (Tunisia), or Hosni Mubarak (Egypt) or Bashar al-Assad (Syria), just to name a few.
With these guys, the West has for decades maintained the best relations, because they were 'our dictators' who served our interests.
Suddenly they were converted to evil dictators, because no longer useful to the interests.
They were either experiencing a color revolution and toppled, or swept away by a war of aggression and murdered.
For Assad, they are still working on it.
Parsifal, June 25, 2015
First friends then enemies ... top Saddam Hussein meets Donald Rumsfeld ... below Muhamar Ghaddafi meets Barack Obama.
Since they no longer served the interests of Washington, they were first coated with a war and then 'removed'.
With Viktor Yanukovych was just applied the same procedure.
He was the darling of Washington, as long as a good boy as he lead Ukraine to the West.
He was between 2002 and 2005 and again in 2006 and 2007 Prime Minister of Ukraine, and from February 2010 President.
But when he refused, for understandable reasons, to sign the Association Agreement with the EU, he was first by a propaganda campaign torn as an evil dictator and then removed with a violent coup in February 2014.
But Washington's puppets Zionist Arseniy Yatsenyuk and Zionist Petro Poroshenko were used as a (Fascist *) junta.
A typical case, beforehand good and then bad, so must be done a regime change.
Saudi Arabia is an example of a good dictatorship that serves the interests and therefore may do everything.
The regime there is probably the worst, most homicidal and inhuman of the world, but that's all no problem for America and Europe.
On human rights violations is benevolently overlooked and treated the royal despot, constantly courted and kept in power.
Obama, Cameron, Hollande and Merkel often journey there and make because of the petrodollars the best bargains, mainly arms deals.
Eventually, if the Saudi regime is no longer toes the line, it will be dropped, call the evil dictatorship and undergo a regime change.
Now I can already imagine the propaganda and statements of Western politicians.
'We are completely bewildered, because we now have learnt the Saudi regime oppresses women, does not allow them motoring, and for lowest crime chops man hands off and executes the death penalty by beheading with a sword.
This we can not allow, and therefore the regime must go'.
But meanwhile does allow the West these brutal methods for 80 years, since the discovery of oil wealth and exploitation by Western oil corporations.
As long as the Saudi regime sells the oil only for dollars, as long as Washington guarantees the preservation of power.
This deal has negotiated Kissinger in early 70's, after the gold backing of the dollar was lifted.
The carried forward enforcement of ethics, morality, human rights and democracy, is just a show for the stupid and naive audience.
If a regime serves the interests of America, then it may do everything and suppress the population and take all freedoms.
Conversely, a country can be very democratic, respect human rights even more so when it does not serve the interests of America, it is flattened.
See what happened to Chile when Kissinger gave the CIA the order the democratically elected government of Salvador Allende, which was more socialist oriented to remove by a violent coup and replace by a fascist military dictatorship.
With Belarus the Empire State has also attempted regime change.
President Alexander Lukashenko has been designated by the former American Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice as 'Europe's last dictator', which must therefore go.
Has not worked out so far.
Whereas there is a state leader who already is much longer in power and can be truly called the last dictator.
But again, he is not bothered because he is 'our dictator'.
To whom it is ?
To Milo Ðukanović of Montenegro.
He was President of the Republic of Montenegro (1998-2002) and several times (1991-1998, 2002-2006 and 2008-2010) Prime Minister of his country.
Since December 2012, he is again the Acting Prime Minister of Montenegro.
Ðukanović ruled uninterruptedly in different form already for 27 years, which corresponds to a permanent dictatorship.
Not even Josef Stalin had been so long in power in the Soviet Union.
Why do we hear no criticism of these very long 'reign' on the part of Washington or Brussels ?
Why do we allow him card blanche, although investigations running against Ðukanović in Italy and Germany because of cigarette smuggling on a large scale ?
The guy's a criminal and is part of the Balkan Mafia.
Yes why ?
Because he promised to lead the country as soon as possible in the European Union and NATO.
Aha, it serves our interests, then of course, not the usual mud-slinger is cranked, as the West makes it otherwise with unpleasant state leaders that they want to get rid of.
What we learn from this ?
Washington, Brussels, London, Paris and Berlin do not care really whether a state leader of any country to comply with the human rights, acting democratically, and implement and defend the so-called 'Western Values' (laughing).
That's completely irrelevant.
It may be the most brutal dictatorship, it is only important that the regime obeys the commands.
If it follows and acts in the interests of the West, then the regime has a charter to be able to do with the public what it wants.
But if a government does not follow and if it wants to go its own independent way, even if it is still legitimized as democratic, then it will be defamed, portrayed as vicious and putsches away.
That is, every time we hear by Western politicians and media, this or that president is an other 'evil dictator' and the 'new Hitler', Saddam was so called, as well as Ghaddafi, Dr. Assad and Putin, then we know, AHA, these leaders do not what they are told from Washington, they are not following orders and decide for themselves what is best for their country.
You can then often assume what we are then told bad things about it is not true but the opposite may very assuredly be true.
It's all about to establish a bogeyman in order to provoke and stage a coup in order to remove this person and replace by someone who obeys.
How often, Washington has been trying to assassinate Fidel Castro in Cuba ?
They have also tried with the debarment of CIA mercenaries at the Bay of Pigs, to overthrow the government by force.
Against the President of Venezuela Hugo Chávez they have done several times assassinations.
Because the governments of Cuba and Venezuela do not submit the dictates of Washington.
What we learn from history, if a revolution does not work when a coup will not work if sanctions do not work if even the target person survived an assassination attempt, the war machine is used to carry out regime change.
See what they did with Saddam Hussein.
Washington has tried all methods to get rid of him.
First, bribery, then a boycott, then an uprising and then assassinations.
When he survived it all, Washington had to pull as a final step an aggressive war justified with lies.
Yes, they have attached to him the ownership of non-existent weapons of mass destruction, which threaten the whole world.
So it came to the war of aggression against Iraq, it was invaded the country, occupied and captured him and then hung.
That it did not exist the dangerous weapons and the threat was a pack of lies then no longer mattered.
The same procedure one tries with The Iran for decades.
An other country that not subjects the dictates of Washington and therefore had to be invented the story about a nuclear weapons program.
The sanctions have not let the country collapse, the color revolution has not overthrown the government, and assassinations also brought nothing, so we threatened with war.
Against Russia and President Putin for some time this strategy is applied, as Russia is the largest country in the world and he himself are the American world domination most in the way.
Therefore, he really must go.
Therefore, Putin and Russia is pelted with filth, the worst lies are told, and tried with a foreign funded 5th Column to incite the Russian people.
Therefore harsh sanctions are imposed and a financial war started to destroy the Russian currency.
But since this has not led to the goal and Putin enjoys a popularity of over 80 percent in the population, the war machine now comes into the play.
Therefore, the current upgrade and deployment of NATO troops and heavy weapons to the border with Russia.
Washington is determined to a war and is ready to carry out a nuclear first strike.
To enforce their (bad) dream of a world empire, are no-holds-barred, including the destruction of Europe.
The Cold War was only therefore not hot because West as East mutually realized and understood nuclear annihilation.
This insight, however, came to a complete loss in Washington after the collapse of the Soviet Union, because the US has declared itself the winner.
Now they are so arrogant, so boastful, and so sure-footed and think that one can lead a nuclear war and itself thereby get away undamaged:
So cracked are the psychopaths in Washington.
Your support to have the B.O.L.E. (incl. all articles) open and free for everyone is much appreciated.
The psychoanalyst Dieter Duhm writes that
'the ideological confessions are interchangeable as long as the inner structures are the same'.
Duhm calls this the 'most basic fundamental fact of political life'.
What distinguishes a mass murderer of an average citizen ?
The famous Swiss psychologist Alice Miller discovered in their biographical studies:
In both works the same structure of latent violence.
And if the experience of humiliation is almost made of an entire people, then accrues in a society a murderous potential of hatred and congested aggression, which enthusiastic lunges onto a prefixed enemy and eventually discharges into pogroms and wars.
Political channeling of dammed life energies
All imperialist systems know this psychic underground and use it for their own political interests - of Nazism, as well as the United States in its propaganda for the 'war on terror' (de facto war on brown people).
The power structures could not maintain itself if these were not available on a subconscious response in all of humanity.
What Hitler would have been without the projection of millions of heated Germans ?
What made the impoverished postcard painter from Braunau to the 'Führer' of the 'Aryan Race' was the demonic power of dammed life energy throughout the population that found a common channel and expression by his Nazi ideology.
Hitler and his men took not care to rational arguments, but solely relied on emotionally effective agitation.
In the psychological subsoil of Germany was ticking a bomb - and Hitler knew how to make it explode.
What happened in Germany between 1933 and 1945, was the culmination of an epochal cruel madness of 6.000 years of patriarchal history of war.
It was the result of a worldwide trauma, which was etched with the most terrible methods in humanity.
After centuries and millennia, in which the experiences of forced displacement, genocide, rape and war has been repeatedly imprinted into the human soul, the world's population lived under a genetic programming of fear, defence, mistrust and violence.
This information-pattern - the morphogenetic field of the war - dominated mankind to this day and is passed continuously.
The perpetrators of today are the victims of yesterday.
The perpetrators of tomorrow are the victims of today - until we realize the insanity and break the cycle.
As Fascism could rise
Hans de Boer, who fought already in his youth in the resistance against Hitler and later reported about the cruel power structures of imperialism, said:
'Indifference is the fascism of our time'
The more indifferent people are, the lower their active participation in the political process and global, the more subtle totalitarian systems can operate and the more undisturbed, they can destabilize countries of other continents and exploit.
The existing society pretends to be cosmopolitan and tolerant, and environmentally friendly, but is based on an unspoken agreement of what can be said and what may not.
If one dares to cross this convention and to ask questions that threaten the ideological foundation of the society, for example, whether the attacks on September 11 were not commissioned by the US government itself, then you will be assigned a label 'Conspiracy theorist' or 'anti-Semite', etc. and well covered by the media turned off.