Sierra Leone is a Republic in West Africa, North-East of Guinea, South-East of Liberia and on the coast of the Atlantic Ocean.
The Land is next to the neighboring Liberia, the worst affected from the Ebola outbreak.
1.200 people are there, according to the latest figures from the World Health Organization (WHO) died from the virus; other organizations speak of far higher number of victims.
The media in Sierra Leone very recently report, a treatment of viral infection appears to be successful.
At the same time the question is asked, why there is so much resistance to this treatment ?
The Minister of Information, Alpha Kanu, has reported that the treatment works, people are doing better, but is suppressed the information about the method of treatment by the FDA (governmental food and drug administration of the United States) as well as other organizations.
Parsifal, October 22, 2014
image top: Information Minister Alpha Kanu
At the moment is any treatment of Ebola, whether by artificial pharmaceutical or natural substances, experimental.
Therefore, the question arises, why is only one option approved, and the other not ?
The substance, the Information Minister of Sierra Leone describes as successfully, is Nanosilver, a water solution with 10ppm silver is called Silver-Water, or Colloidal Silver. Interestingly, the delivery of this solution was systematically prevented.
Dr. Rima Laibow, the Director of the manufacturer, Natural Solutions Foundation (NSF) said,
'the product was sent at August 20 to Sierra Leone, however, arrived at September 28.
During these 5 weeks spread the disease and people have suffered and died unnecessarily because 'international forces' wanted to prevent the clinical application'.
The WHO published on August 12. an announcement where is claimed, there is no proven treatment for Ebola, but even unproven options should made available the people who are affected.
On the WHO's website is said:
'In the particular circumstances of this outbreak, and provided certain conditions are met, the panel reached consensus that it is ethical to offer unproven interventions with as yet unknown efficacy and adverse effects, as potential treatment or prevention'.
If one accepts this statement of the WHO literally, then the organization is open to all sides, the principal thing it is it effective - only the Western Health authorities don't agree that way.
But of course I know what the WHO really means, namely administer untested medication of the pharmaceutical industry the patient, use as test objects.
Surely not the use of products of those manufacturers which work naturally.
But should challenge the WHO by the word and the regulatory authorities portend steady.
The FDA cracked down hard against the Natural Solutions Foundation, as against two other companies who offer natural products which make statements on healing which are but not approved.
On the website of the FDA is stated that all food additives, oils, herbs and other natural products can not be provided with the claim that these can 'diagnose any disease, treat, cure, or prevent'.
Such products must have a disclaimer in this regard, because the American government says, 'only a drug can legally claim such'.
This means that no matter how effective, traditional art of healing, folk medicine and proven a natural substance, there is in fact a gag order for all companies which produce and market products based on natural, because they may not review 'promises' for healing.
The same applies by the way - in a globalised world - also for all the countries in Europe.
Legally 'cure' can only the products, which the pharmaceutical corporations produce.
Everything else is quackery.
Who now exaggerated claims that tried-and-true home remedies like prune juice or prunes help with constipation are now punishable by law.
No, you have to pay the tablets of the pharmaceutical industry in a pharmacy, even if an effect is doubtful and there are numerous side effects.
It doesn't matter what really helps and works, but it is only important, it must be an artificial product of Big Pharma and have the acceptance of the health authorities.
For me, this means that priority is not the healing of the sick people, but profit.
Most of the companies which offer natural products say it's about strengthening the body's defenses, because the body heals best itself.
This seems to happen in Sierra Leone.
Kanu has made it clear that his government does not need the approval of the FDA or other foreign health organization to offer various treatment options in the own country.
Alpha Kanu said the people suffering in his country have the right to use any and all methods of treatment available.
'It is about the free choice',
he says and it is
'up to patients or their families, what they apply against Ebola'.
The Minister of Information has, together with President Ernest Bai Koroma done what they could do to get the Silver-water to Sierra Leone.
It is but for Thousands of years known Silver has an antibacterial effect.
Already the ancients have put a silver coin in the amphorae for wine or water, to make them more durable for long trips.
Also knew the Romans and therefore used Silver cutlery and drunk from Silver cups.
Not only because it is precious, but because healthy.
It means, by the use of the cutlery when eating come tiny amounts of silver in the body, which kill germs and strengthen the immune system.
The same effect is achieved by a water solution with 10ppm of silver in it.
But so 'easy', it may probably not be from the point of view of the disease industry and the boards of disease who, yes, need no healthy people, because they live through the disease.
Where would we be, if by this simple method people will become and stay healthy - what I hereby suggest.
I quote from Wikipedia:
'Usually silver is used for bactericidal purposes, therefore, in medical devices as a coating or in colloidal form, increasingly, Nano-Silver.
Silver ions are used as disinfectants and as a therapeutic agent in wound therapy.
These can Silver-sensitive pathogens reversibly inhibit after a relatively long exposure time, in addition, can act bacteriostatic or even bactericidal (so deadening).
The issue being presented here is the oligodynamic effect'.
From the pharmaceutical lobby and the authorities is, of course, warned about the danger of Silver, if is ingested too much.
The therapeutic ingestion of colloidal silver is controversial, is the least of what they say.
But says another American authority, the EPA, the Environmental Protection Agency that very low oral intake of amounts of up to 5 micrograms of silver per kilogram of body weight and day would lead to no poisoning.
As said by the famous Philippus Theophrastus Aureolus Bombastus von Hohenheim, named Paracelsus (1493-1541), Swiss physician, Alchemist, mystic, and philosopher:
'All things are poisons, for there is nothing without poisonous qualities. It is only the dose which makes a thing poison'
You can from too much chocolate cake 'over-eat' and die, but also from an overdose approved drugs.
According to Kanu has a generous citizens of Sierra Leone who lives in Atlanta, US, compelled the delivery of Silver-water, what was administered the Ebola patients.
'He has sent the Nano-silver - it works; people are doing better.
The delivery is sufficient for 300 patients and we will get more',
Meanwhile, there are reports from several neighboring countries affected by Ebola where by the intake of a water solution with 10ppm silver would result in the patients feeling better.
The strengthened immune system, defeats the infection without further assistance.
Thus the question arises:
Why prevent the FDA and other authorities, allegedly so concerned about the health of the population, to spread information about natural substances which may help ?
The successes in Sierra Leone are hushed up, and only the fear-mongering and the faith in the pharmaceutical industry are promoted.
If they claim that there is a serious crisis, and so the whole of humanity is at risk, what a role does it play whereby people become healthy again ?
Would not the real responsible be more likely interested to solve the problem and save lives, rather to represent the economic interests of a particular industry and so fill their pockets ?
The pharmaceutical industry has so far developed three vaccines against Ebola but are not yet approved for use on humans.
These vaccines are, in principle, genetically modified from 'harmless viruses', so that they produce a specific protein of the Ebola virus.
They are intended to stimulate the immune system to make antibodies against this produced protein.
The vaccines are now tested in clinical trials on volunteers and may be available millions of times from January 2015 applied in Africa.
So you get in the lab (genetically) modified viruses injected to fight a virus.
Speaking of fighting: In Sierra Leone are already since the beginning of October, more than 160 Cubans as medical personnel in action.
Overall, Cuba as part of its assistance for the Ebola affected West African States has agreed the deployment of nearly 500 volunteers.
Also in the neighboring country of Liberia arrived meanwhile further 52 doctors and nurses from Cuba for use against the disease.
For sure, these evil, evil Communists are only up to evil, and it is about a hidden 'Invasion'.
Not like the US, which sent 3.000 soldiers to Africa.
For Washington, it's everything a war and all problems will be solved militarily, even an infection.
So far, there died 4.400 in West Africa from Ebola.
This is certainly bad also for the families.
But, in Germany, die alone 15.000 people each year from the consequences of a flu and worldwide 250.000 to 500.000 people.
Since the emergence of the patented 'Ebola Virus' died UNREPORTED approximately 350.000 humans from the consequences of Malaria - where lies the emphasis ?
Is there not in comparison because of Ebola made a completely exaggerated panic and effort ?