Conspiracies & False Flags
The Constitution Con Tags: Conspiracy Forbidden History Secret Societies Social Engineering

by Co-Creating Our Future on Planet Earth

Every American should take this extremely well researched article by the Irish historian, Michael Tsarian, as required reading! Thomas Deegan understands this, completely! See his graphic records that prove this HERE. As a result, he sits fraudulently in prison, while the Pope and his minions in our government prepare to use bio- and chemical warfare on us all; clearly Putin also knows this. See HERE and HERE.


The Constitution Con (A Story of Parchment Idolatry)

The first function of the founders of nations, after the founding itself, is to devise a set of true falsehoods about origins – a mythology – that will make it desirable for nationals to continue to live under common authority, and, indeed, make it impossible for them to entertain contrary thoughts – Forrest McDonald (E Pluribus Unum)


The US Constitution was created on September 17, 1787, and ratified behind closed doors on June 21, 1788. Thirty nine of the fifty five delegates attending the Philadelphia Convention signed the document. Their con job is evident from the very first line penned. Legally, the “People” mentioned are not sovereign beings, but willing slaves who have been granted the illusion of freedom.

From an occult point of view the Constitution was ratified on an Atonist festival day. It is, therefore, a patently Solar Cult document. This is because the date of ratification – June 21st – is the day the sun ascends to its highest point in the zodiac.


Benjamin Franklin, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton were three of the men who framed the infernal Constitution and pushed for its ratification. Their document served the American aristocracy, not the people. In fact the document was never put before the people for ratification, and was openly opposed by the majority of men and women in the original thirteen states, who resisted coming together to form any kind of unified nation. Facts of this sort have been deliberately concealed through the decades, but are now openly accepted by some mainstream American historians, such as Joseph Ellis, Thomas DiLorenzo, and others.

The Constitutionalists were guileful traitors whose attendance at the Philadelphia Convention was kept secret for an entire generation. Their document served to leave the “door” of America unlocked and ajar, so the country’s foreign enemies could surreptitiously re-enter in the days and years following the supposed War of Independence.

 Benjamin Franklin, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton – architects of monarchy in disguise


The hypocrisy and duplicity of the Federalists is responsible for modern neo-imperialism and advent of the so-called New World Order. In our opinion these men were little more than British agents, because King George himself – who declared eternal war on America – could not have done as much damage to America as their actions wrought.

Such a tyrannical future where property rights would be ignored, where a massive standing army would lurk unchallengeable, where Congressmen would hold office for life, where ruinous treaties would be commonplace, where Presidential powers would make Nero jealous, where gold and silver would vanish from circulation to be replaced by the worthless “notes” of a private banking conglomeration, where the States would be reduced to mere administrative departments of the feds, and where the grasp of taxation would actually reach into the common laborer’s paycheck – all this was too fantastic to be even theoretically contemplated during the ratification debates – Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty)

When the duplicitous Hamilton was asked why he helped draft the Constitution, he guardedly replied:

                  My motives must remain in the depository of my own breast.

He was but one member of the Philadelphia Convention who secretly resented the independence of America. One perceptive dissenter realized this and wrote:

The Continental convention…was composed of some men of excellent characters; of others who were more remarkable for their ambition and cunning, than their patriotism; and of some who have been opponents to the independence of the United States – (Dissenting Address of the Pennsylvanian Convention, 18 December 1787)

James Madison is considered the “father” of the US Constitution. He was heavily influenced, as were many American politicians, by the philosophy of French aristocrat Baron de Montesquieu who believed in monarchy. Madison was also influenced by the writings of British empiricist philosopher John Locke, himself “a major investor in the English slave trade through the Royal Africa Company.” Madison was vehemently opposed to state independence and pushed the Constitution to keep power out of the hands of ordinary Americans. He openly advocated an anti-Republican ideology and commented on how illiterate masses should be divided and controlled:

Where a majority are united by a common sentiment, and have an opportunity, the rights of the minor party become insecure. In a republican government the majority, if united, have always an opportunity. The only remedy is to enlarge the sphere and thereby divide the community into so great a number of interests and parties that, in the first place, a majority will not be likely, at the same moment, to have a common interest separate from that of the whole, or of the minority; and, in the second place, that, in case they should have such an interest, they may not be so apt to unite in the pursuit of it – (Elliot’s DebatesVol. 5)

Madison was the only delegate to keep records of proceedings at the Convention. However, his notes were not made public until four years after his death. Prior to their public release the notes had been thoroughly edited.

The con is evident from the Constitution’s Preamble, as we said. In fact the “People” referred to are not citizens of America, No! They are the elites who rule from within a legally separate precinct known as the District of Columbia. This district is under federal control and the government operating from within it is, legally speaking, a foreigninstitution. The term “We the People”  denotes this separate ruling elite. It refers to the imperious overlords who have granted the Constitution to the masses within the “United States of America” – the non-sovereign nation under their control. Therefore, the entity mentioned in the first line of the Preamble is not the same entity mentioned in the last line. Let’s read it again and uncover the cunning artifice of its authors:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, ensure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
This is what the Preamble subtextually infers:

WE THE RULING ARISTOCRACY, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, ensure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution FOR THE SLAVES WITHOUT RIGHTS, UNDER OUR FEDERAL CONTROL.

Because “People” is capitalized it is a proper noun referring to a specific body of people – Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty)

These facts explain why the word “for” is found in the last line, not the word “of.” Legally, there is a big difference between:

                   …do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.


                  …do ordain and establish this Constitution of the United States of America.

The first rendering implies the Constitution has been granted to one body by another. Ergo the Constitution is nothing more than a totalitarian document, ratifying aristocratic control over the “United States of America” and its inhabitants. The elites are literally saying: “This document and its articles are for you.” The point being that it is not of you, meaning, it is not yours by natural right. The word “for” indicates that the matter of the document is bestowed or imposed by others. And of course when a person gives someone something, they presumably want something in return. This was certainly the case for the cunning Federalists who conceived the Constitution.

Suggestively, the word “of” does appear in a meaningful legal declaration. It appears in the text of the Presidential Oath:

I solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

In this instance, the word “of” designates the President as a member of the aristocratic elite – denoted by the words “United States.” He is, therefore, a ruler separate from the citizens in the various states. The “for” does not apply to the President because, unlike the masses, he is not an outsider. He is part of the inner sovereign cadre referenced by the word “of.” The Constitution is “of” the ruling elite, but is “for” the masses. In effect the Constitution is a schizophrenic document. There are two Constitutions; one for the serving masses, and one for the served oligarchs ruling from within the legally sacrosanct District of Columbia. This is why the Preamble contains two different terms: the “United States” (denoting the oligarchy and their authority), and “United States of America” (denoting the non-sovereign masses on the receiving end).

If the Presidential Oath read as follows, there would be less cause for concern:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States of America, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America.

Then again, pigs might fly. Alarmingly, before it was dropped, the President’s original title was “His Excellency.”

Read More Here


How The Mass Media Controls Consensus Reality Tags: Conspiracy Mind Control Orwellian World Social Engineering

by Paul A Philips

-“The people will believe what the media tells

them they believe.” George Orwell


“It’s not a matter of what is true that counts but

a matter of what is perceived to be true.”



-“Whoever controls the media controls reality.”

-Peter Jennings.


 -“When a well-packaged web of lies has been

sold gradually to the masses over generations,

the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its

speaker a raving lunatic.”

Dresden James. 

In an earlier message I wrote:  “Nothing in the world is as it seems.”On one level, the ‘theatre of illusion’ world we live in believed by many to be true can be mainly attributed to two things.

1.  The hidden controllers running the planet have managed to manipulate the mass media and in effect control consensus reality.  This has been done to produce the desired behavioural patterns; thoughts, opinions, attitudes, social norms… in the masses so that they can be ruled over. In short, the media is regarded by the hidden controllers  as a necessary tool for a dictatorship.

2. The majority of the human population has allowed itself to be deceived through ignorance, deception, stupidity, chronic apathy or a serious lack of curiosity and questioning, all somewhat bolstered by cynicism… Consumerism rules; as long as their bellies are full and heads filled with mindless entertainment or other gratuitous distraction… they’re happy.  Genetic cloning is unnecessary. Cloning has already been done care of the effects of mass media brainwashing.

Taking the above two factors into account let’s look at just how the mass media controls consensus reality.

Tool for a Dictatorship

The hidden controllers  regard the human population as nothing more than sheep incapable of looking after themselves, needing to be shepherded. This has been made abundantly clear over the years by spokesmen/agents for the controllers  advocating mind control techniques in the mass media for shaping human thought.

–I would encourage looking up names such as Walter Lippmann (1920’s on), one of the founding fathers of the Council on Foreign Relations, the Tavistock Institute, England who have ties to freemasons, Harold Lasswell (1939-40 Rockefeller funded), Sir Alexander King for the Club of Rome in the 1990’s touting the advantages of new communications technology as an agent of change for a ‘one world order.’  … It’s quite an interesting insight.

In through the backdoor of the subconscious mind

“If we understand the mechanism and motives of the group mind, it is now possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their knowing it.”

-Edward Bernays

For me, one of the most interesting advocates was Edward Bernays. Most people today probably wouldn’t be familiar with him, but will know his Uncle, Sigmund Freud and many could well have been at some time in their lives under the extraordinary influence of his ideas. Having studied his Uncle’s work, Bernays knew how the unconscious worked and how it could influence others without them knowing. He very successfully took his ideas to the mass media in the form of subliminal advertising through subliminal perception.

This occurs when we perceive something in the media like, for example, an advert, but only a part of it reaches our consciousness awareness. The rest of the advert, containing a hidden message, is perceived by our subconscious and because we are unaware of this can cause us to behave in certain ways without knowing why. I call it’ in through the backdoor of the subconscious mind’.  These ‘in through the backdoor’ hidden subliminal messages in mass media can influence us in many ways and without doubt as Bernays had predicted has been as major influence in controlling people’s thoughts, opinions, attitudes without them ever being aware of it.


Now take a look at these examples of subliminal advertising. Most people have found this piece of conniving trickery quite fascinating:

At first glance, this looks like a perfectly innocent advert for the 18-30 club, but when looked at closely you can see the carefully planned out sexual connotations. The same applies to the advert below. In both cases the adverts are planned so that the unaware prospective customer will only subconsciously perceive the various sexual positions hinted at (but will go on to the buy the holiday..?!).

Doctors have been used to advertise smoking cigarettes. Look at these 1950’s adverts.


The scheme behind this relates to the subliminal thought that Doctors are trustworthy figures. So people then get the idea in their subconscious that it’s healthy to smoke Camel cigarettes…


Remember, subliminal perception is used to influence the masses in a wide range of things; political, educational and scientific indoctrination…etc.


Arrested Development 

The mass media has been and still is a useful tool for the controllers  in holding back opportunity for real human growth and development: It has become a massive dam of lies and cover-ups; holding back a wealth of knowledge for raising conscious awareness, self-sufficiency and unity for the human race.  The result is basically a planet full of people going nowhere in their lives while the walls surrounding slowly draw in closer, further restricting their freedom.

Media Monopolization 

Roughly over 20 years, it stuns me to write that the entire mass media ownership in the USA has gone from 50 to just 5 corporations:  AOL-Time Warner, Disney, Sony, Vivendi Universal and Viacom.

The idea of having so few media corporations means that the hidden controllers  can more easily be in charge of what they want to release to the people. This, in essence, means giving the public at large one limited viewpoint, one voice, one point of view, one propaganda message…to produce  consent. For example, ‘There are weapons of mass destruction in Iraq…’ used to engineer consent for the war in Iraq.


A shift in the Wind

-“If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, it expects

what never was and never will be … The people cannot

 be safe without information. When the press is free ,

every man is able to read, all is safe.”

–  Thomas Jefferson

An ignorant population does not look to see the greater way, never questions authorities or understand rights and therefore provides little opposition to a dictatorship. If we want to grow as a race we must start educating ourselves. Be able to learn to discern. Recognise when the media is trying to manipulate us. Whatever it is we’re subjected to in the media, beware of the hidden ulterior motive. Perhaps it would be better to boycott this propagandist pap altogether and instead of being listless or unresponsive,  do something worth-while, campaign for the truth…

More from Paul at NewParadigm


Are Americans And Britons Being Prepped For A Military Coup? Tags: Conspiracy Media And Politics Orwellian World Police State

Photo credit:

By Brandon Turbeville

A recent poll conducted by YouGov revealed that a sizable portion of the American public is open to the idea of a military coup in the United States. The poll was conducted amid the continual polling that takes place during the U.S. Presidential election yet it did not focus on the elections per se, but the potential lack of elections in the future.

The YouGov poll surveyed 1,000 people online and determined that 29% of Americans, over a quarter of the population, could imagine supporting a military coup against the civilian government. Only 41% could not imagine supporting a coup.

The numbers supporting a potential coup were highest among Republicans with 43% of them saying they could envision supporting a coup, 29% of independents followed, with Democrats trailing at 20%.

The numbers apparently increased in support when the question asked “whether they would hypothetically support the military stepping in to take control from a civilian government which is beginning to violate the constitution.”

Critics of the polls have suggested that the method used to conduct the survey was largely unscientific and not a reasonable representation of an accurate sampling of the general American public.


Regardless of how it was conducted, the real question here is “Why was this poll conducted in the first place?” Why are Americans being asked if they would support a military coup? After all, in the past, whenever a critic of the government would suggest such a possibility, that individual was laughed off the stage as being paranoid and hyperbolic. We are told military coups are not an option in the United States and, being the exceptional nation, we are outside of history. We are told that the very idea that a military coup could ever take place is laughable. So, why the poll?

Indeed, as the TWSP has asked, “Who commissioned it? Was it ordered up by a clique of ambitious and disgruntled military men eager to redeem their defeats on the battlefield with some kind of seizure of power here in the United States? Up to now, we do not know these answers.”

The question is thus: Are the American people being prepped to accept a military coup in the United States and the subsequent martial law that will almost inevitably follow such a seizure of power?
Was this poll conducted for the benefit of the oligarchs who would perpetuate this coup? Not likely, since the Pentagon and the Military-Government-Intelligence apparatus already has extravagant ways of knowing whether or not the American people are receptive to coups. Was it merely an exercise in predictive programming and trend setting polling data – the same method that is used in color revolutions – to create a sense of social consensus and promote the idea that the majority supports a specific idea?

But the United States is not the only country that has had talk of military coups as of late. Upon the election of Jeremy Corbyn as leader of the UK Labor Party, a “senior serving general” opined that, if Corbyn was ever elected as Prime Minister, the military might simply remove him from power.

According to a report by the London Daily Mail,

“A senior serving general, speaking anonymously to the Sunday Times, said Mr. Corbyn’s victory has been greeted with ‘wholesale dismay’ in the army.”

He added:

“There would be mass resignations at all levels and you would face the very real prospect of an event which would effectively be a mutiny.

‘Feelings are running very high within the armed forces. You would see a major break in convention with senior generals directly and publicly challenging Corbyn over vital important policy decisions such as Trident, pulling out of NATO and any plans to emasculate and shrink the size of the armed forces…

The Army just wouldn’t stand for it. The general staff would not allow a prime minister to jeopardize the security of this country and I think people would use whatever means possible, fair or foul to prevent that. You can’t put a maverick in charge of a country’s security.’”

Corbyn’s plans and “reforms” are relatively mild on many accounts. However, that is apparently enough to justify the seizure of total power by the military in the minds of some. It also echoes the past claims by retired Army Gen. Paul E. Vallely, a friend of accused pedophile and avowed Satanist Michael Aquino, that he had answered a call asking if he would lead a coup against the civilian government if he were provided with 250,000 marines. Vallely responded that, yes, he would indeed lead a coup if the conditions were right.

While it remains to be seen what plans are being set in motion for the future of civilian governments in the United States and the UK, it is greatly concerning that convenient polls regarding military coups are being conducted and disseminated amongst the public while serving and retired military officials talk openly of the same act of treason. As discontent grows with higher unemployment, increased immigration, more foreign wars, higher food prices, and lower living standards, it is apparent that the ruling elite in both the United States and the UK – actually one and the same – are preparing to ensure that such discontent will be crushed and that no reforms, however modest, will ever be allowed to move forward.

Americans and British people must understand what is at stake before it is too late.

Brandon Turbeville – article archive here – is an author out of Florence, South Carolina. He has a Bachelor’s Degree from Francis Marion University and is the author of six books, Codex Alimentarius — The End of Health Freedom7 Real ConspiraciesFive Sense Solutions and Dispatches From a Dissident, volume 1 and volume 2The Road to Damascus: The Anglo-American Assault on Syria,and The Difference it Makes: 36 Reasons Why Hillary Clinton Should Never Be President. Turbeville has published over 500 articles dealing on a wide variety of subjects including health, economics, government corruption, and civil liberties. Brandon Turbeville’s podcast Truth on The Tracks can be found every Monday night 9 pm EST at UCYTV. He is available for radio and TV interviews. Please contact activistpost (at)


Search a Blog

October 2015 (53)
September 2015 (324)
August 2015 (336)
July 2015 (314)
June 2015 (305)
May 2015 (378)
April 2015 (396)
March 2015 (400)
February 2015 (374)
January 2015 (454)
December 2014 (457)
November 2014 (523)
October 2014 (470)
Blog Categories

Support the B.O.L.E.

Thank you for supporting the BOLE

The B.O.L.E. is completely funded by community, managed and maintained by volunteers. Please consider making a contribution so more stories of awakening and alternative views can be shared!

NEW *** We also take


Focusing On Real Values

A great way to a new standard.

Gold in small units, also one gram at time

Products for your Wellness

Important: For all products chose at the top of the page the  language (English or German) and currency!

 click HERE to reach all products

TATWellness deliver worldwide.

In Your Service


This website is powered by Spruz

Live Support