Most of the ‘terrorist’ bomb attacks of the past sixty years have been false-flag attacks that were actually committed by the Israeli Mossad, the CIA, and British intelligence. For six decades the allied Western intelligence agencies have been carrying out an ongoing campaign to frame Muslims for bombings which were actually perpetrated by the Western intelligence agencies themselves. The attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on 9/11/2001 were a joint CIA/Pentagon/Mossad false-flag operation that was intended to provide an excuse for the subsequent US-led Coalition invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq.
The Western nations are not unique in their use of false-flag bombings to inspire public support for a government policy of aggression. The Russian government blamed Chechen ‘terrorists’ for perpetrating the horrific Moscow apartment bombings of the summer of 1999, but agents of the Russian FSB were seen placing military-grade explosives in the basement of an apartment building in Ryazan, near Moscow.
The current US and Israeli belligerence toward Iran is the continuation of a modern Crusade by the USA, Israel, the UK, and their allies to gain control of the Middle East oil fields.
The USA is run by a wealthy ruling elite whose enforcement arm, the CIA, operates secretly and without accountability to any authority other than its elite masters. The US Congress and the US President are mere puppets of the ruling elite, and their purpose is to provide the public with an illusion or false facade of democracy.
The US President is a talking head chosen by the ruling elite, who control both of the two major US political parties. The President functions as a spokesman, salesman, and facilitator for the policies of the ruling elite.
The mainstream media in the USA, the UK, Israel, and their allied nations is thoroughly infiltrated and controlled by the allied Western intelligence agencies, led by the CIA and Mossad. The CIA-controlled mainstream media functions as the propaganda arm of the ruling elite.
The banking system in the USA and its allied nations is controlled by the ruling elite, whose agents — the bankers, brokers, and fund managers — manipulate the market to divert funds, both public and private, into the coffers of the ruling elite. The current historically-unprecedented and ever-widening gap between the incomes and fortunes of the rich and the poor throughout the world is the result of the avaricious market manipulations of the ruling elite.
The ruling elite meet privately and in secrecy at gatherings of the Trilateral Commission, the Council of Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg Group, Bohemian Grove, and other venues which are not open to public scrutiny. The ruling elite effectively control the operations of the World Trade Commission, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the United Nations.
Most of the Western ‘democracies’ are actually ruled by a cabal of wealthy elitists who are essentially gangster warlords who control and manipulate national and international politics, the global economy, and the mainstream media to serve their own greedy and insatiable ambitions.
Is there a concentrated plan actively in place to reduce the human population on Planet Earth?
What a question to ask! However, according to a March 2016 paper by Kevin Galalae published in the journal Epidemiology: Open Access titled “Turning Nature against Man: The Role of Pandemics, Vaccines and Genetics in the UN’s Plan to Halt Population Growth” , Galalae sets out in his 16-page article what’s been going on and summarized in the paper’s Conclusion, in part:
All epidemics and pandemics of the past 30 years are fabrications of the UN system and its partners in crime at the national level for the purpose of lowering births below the magic line of replacement level fertility and, more recently, also for limiting life to an economically acceptable and environmentally sustainable age. 
Galalae goes on to conclude:
The strategy of depopulation has evolved and has been accelerated and amplified. Having exposed the covert chemical, biological, psychosocial and economic methods of population control, and having destroyed our governments’ cover of secrecy, we have shut down their ability to commit genocide by turning man against man through the misuse of the institutions of state, concealment of vital information, abuse of the rule of law, perversion of science, falsification of facts, misappropriation of public funds, and the debasement of executive powers. 
While THIS information below probably is the most disturbing of Galalae’s conclusions:
Vaccines now represent the newest battle line between the 1% and the 99% and between international and individual prerogatives. In the 21st century it is the needle not the bomb that causes death and disease at an unimaginable scale and at an unpredictable cost to the genetic endowment of mankind.
But although the weapon has changed the goal remains the same, to stop and reverse our numbers so that by the end of the 21st century everybody will live just as long, just as sterile, and just as sick.
The planet will be saved but mankind destroyed.
Why do I feel that Galalae’s above conclusions are most disturbing? The answer, I feel, is to be found in the fact that most people are proselytized enough to accept, and even believe, either due to political correctness, peer pressure ‘power’, or what’s rendered as ‘factual’ media information, that the deliberate injecting of neurotoxins, anti-fertility and sterility agents (polysorbate 80 is one), squalene, foreign DNA, mycoplasmas, and nanoparticles into infants, toddlers, and teens—in particular—the future of the human race, is called ‘preventive medical care’, which, ironically, is mandated by federal agencies and state laws! Hypothetically, ought it be called “eugenics by vaccination needles”?
The article explains how all Galalae discusses fits in with the “increased urgency to accomplish the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals” plus countless new pathogens that threaten humans. 
That prompts me to ask these questions:
“Where do those new pathogens come from?”
“Are they synthesized in government research labs like Fort Detrick, Maryland, and the infamous Plum Island off the coast of Long Island, New York?” Was Lyme disease invented on Plum Island? 
“Are such ‘inventions’ designated to ‘protect’ us from terroristic assaults thereby making them seem innocuous?”
“Who pays for them? Are taxpayers subsidizing our very own eugenics agenda?”
“Are we unknowingly fulfilling the Georgia Guidestone’s New Age ‘first commandment’? 
“Where are accountability requests and investigations by Congress, the media, religions and their clergy, and most of all, we who are impacted by the New World Order’s obviously sordid agenda?”
One of the graphics included in the Epidemiology: Open Access article is a global map depicting global health threats in 2016. 
Missing from the above map is the recently media-hyped Zika virus for which there’s now a fast-tracked vaccine in the works. Zika-blamed brain birth defects (microcephaly) realistically may be due more to, and result from, the chemical larvicide Pyriproxyfen  used for mosquito control in Brazil, since Zika has been tracked since the 1940s and ‘50s in Africa with no apparent brain anomalies being recorded—only minor flu-like symptoms —until just recently—2015. What caused the Zika virus suddenly to become a teratogen, if that’s what they want to blame? Was it genetically modified at some point? Or, are toxic chemicals placed in Brazil’s water supplies to blame? 
According to Galalae’s article, what the New World Order folks probably want to effectuate and implement by using clandestine chemical birth control measures (vaccines) is what Bill Gates  so avidly endorses, i.e., using vaccines to reduce the population.
The graphic below illustrates that between 2010 and 2050, the smallest demographic is expected to fall between ages 0 to 64, which probably can be accomplished by the more vaccines they can pump into infants, children, and teens, in my opinion, and as Mr. Gates offers with his population control equation in his TED talk. The older folks are those who have not received all the vaccines that the last two generations have been mandated to receive under the guise of ‘herd immunity’ and school attendance regulations, I offer. Can the projected demographics below also be the compelling reason for all the “catch-up” vaccines adults and senior citizens now are being mandated to get ?
Percentage change in the world’s population by age: 2010-2050. 
Galalae’s paper presents some intriguing facts insofar as it states:
Under the pretext of curbing the spread of the polio virus from one country to another the WHO gave itself a plausible reason to intensify eradication activities, in other words to mass vaccinate entire populations in places where the total fertility rate is not under control.
The countries targeted are all high fertility nations and hotspots of poverty, conflict or environmental degradation: Afghanistan (TFR 5), Cameroon (TFR 4.7), Equatorial Guinea (TFR 5), Ethiopia (4.6), Israel (3.1), Nigeria (5.7), Pakistan (3.7), Somalia (6.6) and the Syrian Arab Republic (3) .
On pages 7 and 8 of his thought-provoking article, Galalae presents charts estimating projected declining fertility rates for those countries. However, it should be noted he points out that Brazil’s national fertility rate “is safely below replacement level,” while
Brazil’s regional differences are significant. The northeast, which has the poorest and the brownest (62.5%) people in the country, [where the larvicide was sprayed into water supplies] also has significantly higher fertility rates than the rest of the country, approximately 2.4 children per woman compared to only 1.6 in the south where the population is 75% white.  [CJF emphasis]
Canadian activist and author Kevin Mugur Galalae has engaged in several hunger strikes over the years to bring awareness and influence consciousness on various issues—successfully, too. In April 2016 he’s been ‘camped out’ at the Vatican in Rome, Italy, to bring awareness to the human depopulation agenda. You can hear courageous Kevin interviewed on day 14 of his 2016 hunger strike on The Richie Allen Show.
 Galalae K (2016) Turning Nature against Man: The Role of Pandemics, Vaccines and Genetics in the UN’s Plan to Halt Population Growth. Epidemiology (Sunnyvale) 6: 232. doi:10.4172/2161-1165.1000232
Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.
On Tuesday April 26, former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger participated in a Vietnam War Summit at the LBJ Presidential Library at the University of Texas. Kissinger discussed his role as Security Adviser to Presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford during the Vietnam War before opening the floor to questions from the audience. The event was promoted as unrestricted questions for Henry Kissinger because this is likely the last time he will publicly discuss his role in the war.
When it came time for audience questions I jumped up to get in line. There were two lines, one in each aisle of the auditorium. After 3 questions from each aisle the “unrestricted” questioning ended right on my turn. Some of my more conspiracy minded friends were quick to assume that the event organizers must have recognized me for my activism/journalism and decided that I could not be allowed to question Kissinger. Maybe the organizers saw this video. Either way, the questioning was over and I was not going to get an opportunity to question Kissinger about his thoughts on Russia’s role in the “emerging world order” he loves to speak about. Have no fear, Mr. Kissinger, we will meet again.
Thankfully, the moderator took the time to ask a few pertinent questions and Henry Kissinger’s answers further reveal the nature of the man known simultaneously as the greatest U.S. diplomat and wanted war criminal. Mark Updegrove, moderator and LBJ library director, asked Kissinger to respond to war criminal accusations related to U.S. strategy to winning the Vietnam War, specifically “carpet bombing” of Cambodia.
“I think the word “War criminal” should not be thrown around in the domestic debate,” said Kissinger. “It’s shameful, it’s a reflection on the people who use it. Let’s look at the situation. First, there was no carpet bombing.”
Carpet bombing, or saturation bombing is the process of continuous and progressive aerial bombing designed to inflict damage on every piece of a targeted area. As part of Operation Menu, Cambodia was saturated with bombs, resulting in the deaths of around 4,000 civilians. Kissinger offered his view on the situation and explicitly states that he believes the civilian casualties were justified:
The North Vietnamese moved four divisions into the border areas of Vietnam and Cambodia, and established bases from which they launched attacks into Vietnam. These divisions were put there in opposition to the Cambodian government. When Nixon took office he took a message to the North Vietnamese that he was eager for negotiations. At that point, the North Vietnamese began daily attacks, many of which came from the four divisions occupying Cambodian territory.
After suffering 1,500 casualties, nearly as many as we suffered in ten years of war in Afghanistan, Nixon ordered an attack on the base areas within 5 miles of the Vietnamese border, which were essentially unpopulated. So when the phrase carpet bombing is used… the size of the attack was probably much less than what the Obama administration has done in similar areas. Which I think was justified and therefore I believe what was done in Cambodia was justified. And when we eventually wiped out the base areas the casualties dropped by 80%.
I am a security adviser, I strongly favored it. I certainly was strongly supportive of it, it was correct. And it was in the American interest. And the civilian casualties from these bombings was justified. The argument against doing it was that Cambodia was a neutral country, but a country that 4 divisions on its soil is not a neutral country.
When asked whether he had any regrets about the Vietnam War, Kissinger stated, “Mistakes were made…. But I am proud of the service… one should stand by one’s decisions.” The final question posed to Mr. Kissinger was how will history judge you? During a momentary pause two audience members yelled out “murderer,” before Kissinger explained that he loses no sleep over what the people think about him. He also said that due to the Internet it’s doubtful that he will receive a fair treatment in the history books.
The Vietnam War took the lives of more than 21,000 Americans and possibly as much as 1.5 million Vietnamese. Many people blame the extensive damage and destruction on officials like Henry Kissinger, especially in regards to the civilian casualties in Cambodia. When reflecting on Henry Kissinger’s role in the Vietnam War it is important to remember that the statesman was controversially awarded the Nobel Peace Prize on December 10, 1973, for negotiating the Paris Peace Accords and “bringing peace to Vietnam.” The Peace Prize was also awarded to North Vietnamese Politburo Member, Le Duc Tho, but Tho rejected the award because peace had not been restored in South Vietnam. Kissinger accepted his award without question.
Whether one considers Henry Kissinger to be a “war criminal” for his actions in Vietnam, it is extremely important to study his other actions in other nations to determine if he does in fact warrant the title. A good place to start is Argentina’s Dirty War. To understand Argentina’s Dirty War, you have to understand Operation Condor, and to understand Operation Condor we must talk about Kissinger. In recently released memos it is made perfectly clear that in 1976 the former Secretary of State gave his approval for Argentina’s Dirty War.
On March 24, 1976, General Jorge Rafael Videla declared martial law after leading a military coup that lasted until 1983. The coup led to the deaths of nearly 30,000 people, including victims who were killed by throwing them alive from helicopters into the Atlantic Ocean. Thousands more were illegally detained and tortured. General Videla was sentenced to prison for human rights violations and died behind bars in 2013.
The Dirty War was only one part of a larger plan known as Operation Condor. Condor was a campaign of political repression and terror involving assassination and intelligence operations implemented in 1975 by the dictatorships of Chile and Argentina. The former Secretary of State was heavily involved in Operation Condor.
Kissinger’s approval of Argentina’s decision to move forward with their repressive campaign has been suspected for years and confirmed since at least 2004 when the National Security Archive released a secret memo recounting a conversation between assistant Secretary of State for Human Rights, Patt Derian, and the US ambassador in Buenos Aires, Robert Hill. The two met in April 1977 and discussed a meeting between Henry Kissinger and Argentine Foreign Minister Cesar Augusto Guzzetti. Kissinger gives Guzzetti explicit permission to move forward with whatever they must do to repress “terrorism.”
In 1987, Martin Edwin Andersen reported that Kissinger had given the Argentine Generals permission to carry out their state-sponsored terrorism. In 2014, Andersen released another memo which is even more clear than the National Security Archive file. The memo contains the conversation between Ambassador Hill and Secretary Derian discussing Argentina’s fears of lecturing from the United States.
The Argentines were very worried that Kissinger would lecture to them on human rights. Guzzetti and Kissinger had a very long breakfast but the Secretary did not raise the subject. Finally Guzzetti did. Kissinger asked how long will it take you (the Argentines) to clean up the problem. Guzzetti replied that it would be done by the end of the year. Kissinger approved.
In other words, Ambassador Hill explained, Kissinger gave the Argentines the green light.
In the memo Kissinger expresses concern over new human rights laws requiring the U.S. to certify that foreign aid would not go towards terrorism. Kissinger wanted the generals to hurry their campaign and get back to normal by the end of the year. Kissinger is well known for promoting the idea of taking action whether legal or not. A leaked transcript from Monday, March 10, 1975 outlines Kissinger’s thoughts on the legality of government sponsored crime.
Kissinger: Before the Freedom of Information Act, I used to say at meetings, “The illegal we do immediately; the unconstitutional takes a little longer.” [laughter] But since the Freedom of Information Act, I’m afraid to say things like that.
Kissinger has evaded questions and legal summons by investigators in France, Spain, Chile and Argentina. They seek answers about his involvement in disappearances of citizens in the US and other countries in regard to Operation Condor. On September 10, 2001, the family of General Schneider initiated a civil action in federal court in DC, claiming that Kissinger gave the agreement to murder the general because he had refused to endorse plans for a military coup in Chile.
November 13, 2002, 11 individuals brought suit against Kissinger for human rights violations following the coup. They accused him of forced disappearance, torture, arbitrary detention, and wrongful death. The suit claims that Kissinger provided practical assistance and encouragement to the Chilean regime with reckless disregard for the lives and well-being of the victims and their families.
Both cases were dismissed based on sovereign and diplomatic immunity. Why? Because people like Henry Kissinger are above the law. To make matters worse, Kissinger, the Bushes, Cheney, Obama, and the rest of the criminals get paraded around and celebrated like heroes to the blind masses who do not even suspect that they are supporting darkness. It is up to each of us to be a shining light for truth and justice. Together we can wake our brothers and sisters and take the power away from people like Henry Kissinger and put it back in the hands of the people.